Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 10 - Jul 15
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
BMR 79-93 Fox Mustang Non-Adj Lower A-Arms Standard Ball Joint Spring Pocket - Black HammertoneA arms are one of the most important, yet overlooked suspension components. They are the direct link between the front wheels and the chassis. Any deflection causes a change in alignment, which results in poor performance and driving feel. Fabricated from heavy duty 1. 5 inch, 0. 095 inch wall and 1. 25 inch, 0. 095 inch wall DOM tubing, deflection is eliminated with A arms from BMR's suspension. BMR's AA034 Lower A arms are equipped with greasable,
A-arms are one of the most important, yet overlooked suspension components. They are the direct link between the front wheels and the chassis. Any deflection causes a change in alignment, which results in poor performance and driving feel. Fabricated from heavy-duty 1.5-inch, 0.095-inch wall and 1.25-inch, 0.095-inch wall DOM tubing, deflection is eliminated with A-arms from BMR's suspension. BMR's AA034 Lower A-arms are equipped with greasable, 95-durometer polyurethane bushings. Polyurethane bushings add a solid, more responsive feel over the stock rubber bushings. BMR's bushings are internally fluted, which allows grease to evenly coat the inner sleeve. These flutes also direct grease to the outer edge of the bushing, keeping the thrust surface lubricated. This efficient lubrication ensures quiet, reliable operation over the life of the bushings.Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 428 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great Small Plates
Style: 600 Count (2 Pack of 300), Size: 300 Count (Pack of 2)
I love these plates. I have been buying them for a couple of years and I think they are a great value. I use them to feed my cats and dog, and for reheating leftovers for lunch at work. They are sturdy, don't soak through, and the perfect size for my needs.
I don't understand why people have left negative reviews because they didn't read or comprehend the clearly listed plate size.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 26, 2024
★★★★★ 5
They do their job!
Style: 600 Count (2 Pack of 300), Size: 300 Count (Pack of 2)
The thickness and the strength of these plates is great. They’re not flimsy at all. I haven’t had any issue with their functionality since small plates are typically for desserts or snacks. The only issue I’ve had is that they tend to be stuck together a fair amount of the time. Before gatherings, I’ve had to separate the plates. Not a huge problem, just a little inconvenience imo.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 25, 2025
★★★★★ 5
She likes them
Style: 600 Count (2 Pack of 300), Size: 300 Count (Pack of 2)
Well priced and provide some spousal relief
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 29, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Small Plate, Big Convenience
Style: 600 Count (2 Pack of 300), Size: 300 Count (Pack of 2)
These plates are sturdy and perfect for snacks and desserts. They don’t bend or soak through easily. Microwave‑safe and super convenient. Excellent value for everyday use.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Good quality for a good quantity
Style: 600 Count (2 Pack of 300), Size: 300 Count (Pack of 2)
Lasted awhile especially with 4 kids in the house, this kept me from washing dishes constantly.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 30, 2025